Assess your starting point
Your design background, engineering communication, and market experience determine the suggested path.
JDTP Creator-to-Product Network
Engineering is not the only starting point. A clear idea can move toward product validation through collaboration.
Choose a 22-lesson path based on your design background, complete the shared commercial challenge, and qualify under the matching scorecard. Only Qualified Creators may then apply for product activities or submit product opportunities.
Application is free. The CAD 49 one-time course and challenge fee is requested only after a written invitation. Qualified Creator is an internal JDTP eligibility status, not an industry credential, and it does not guarantee a campaign invitation, product acceptance, sales, revenue share, or income.
Creator two-stage operating model
The two stages have different paid items, review units, outputs, and written rules. Completing Stage 01 only creates eligibility to apply to Stage 02.
Stage 01 · Qualification program
We are looking for people willing to create, revise, promote, and review evidence. The fee tests commitment; the course, challenge, and human scorecard determine internal eligibility.
Your design background, engineering communication, and market experience determine the suggested path.
Invited learners complete one 22-lesson path and its required after-lesson work in the learner portal.
Everyone completes the same seven commercial tasks under shared evidence standards.
Pass the relevant scorecard to enter the roster and become eligible to apply for product activities.
Two-stage boundary
The qualification stage assesses collaboration, communication, promotion, and review skills. The product stage separately assesses rights, engineering feasibility, samples, and commercial terms.
This is an internal JDTP collaboration status, not an academic, professional, engineering, or legal certification. It does not create employment or automatically provide product access, campaign invitations, design work, commissions, or income.
Two learning paths
Path A closes the engineering-communication gap. Path B closes the market-execution gap. Both require truthful product facts, rights records, manufacturing awareness, and commercial accountability.
Seven hours will not turn a beginner into an engineer. This path teaches you to define the problem, constraints, unknowns, and acceptance evidence in language a design team can act on.
Training outcome: a simulated opportunity brief, engineering-communication package, and evidence index for qualification review. It is not a real project approval.
Technical ability does not automatically create market ability. This path helps turn design value into buyer language, evidence-backed content, attributable orders, and repeatable selling activity.
Training outcome: a simulated fact-controlled content and trial-sale package for qualification review. It is not a product activity or approval.
A or B is a learning route for this qualification, not a lifetime creator label. Both routes lead to the same Qualified Creator roster. Every product is still reviewed separately.
One shared challenge
Both paths complete the same seven-day commercial simulation because later product activities involve needs, rights, productization, promotion, fulfilment, and review. Only the scoring weights change.
Map responsibilities and records from creator to customer.
Define one real use problem with evidence.
Record sources, owners, permissions, and gaps.
Build version, sample, cost, and fact records.
Create an evidence-backed, disclosed demonstration.
Simulate version lock, QC, delivery, and returns.
Submit a launch package, attribution, and revision record.
Two scorecards
Both paths must complete all seven tasks and reach 70/100. Path A weighs engineering communication and productization. Path B weighs market expression, launch, and iteration.
Responsibilities, interfaces, records
Evidence before proposed solutions
Clear references and contribution gaps
An idea converted into assessable input
No invented or inflated product facts
Version, material, and outcome evidence
Reliable delivery and response to feedback
Passing shows readiness to collaborate with design and engineering teams. It is not an independent engineering-design qualification.
Launch ownership and resource planning
A clear audience and use situation
Reviewable ownership and permitted uses
Versions, facts, and evidence stay aligned
Technical value translated into buyer value
Customer expectations and exceptions
Execution followed by evidence-led revision
Passing shows readiness for JDTP's internal market-collaboration gate. It does not mean a product has been accepted or that sales are guaranteed.
Shared red lines
Founding cohort fee
CAD 49 / one time
Application and path recommendation are free. Payment is requested only after a written invitation. There is no monthly creator membership fee.
The course fee is not a design fee, listing fee, or income guarantee. Applications and training submissions do not automatically transfer intellectual property. Product-specific design costs, licences, commissions, and settlement terms are confirmed separately in writing. Read the Creator Program terms.
Stage 02 · Product activities
A Qualified Creator may apply to a JDTP activity or submit a product opportunity. Neither route creates automatic approval.
The invitation states approved product facts, permitted claims, content requirements, attribution, commission rules, sample arrangements, and the activity period.
JDTP separately reviews rights, design needs, samples, manufacturing, and unit economics, then defines fact-based product-page, listing, ad-opening, and CTA language for the target market and channel. No product enters sales before written SKU terms are signed.
Applies to an activity or submits a product opportunity.
Confirms rights, design, samples, cost, and commercial boundaries.
Maintains approved facts, versions, rights, and activity records.
Works only from approved files, materials, and QC gates.
Uses valid attribution, delivery, return status, and written terms.
Fit
FAQ
No. Path A assesses whether you can organize a problem, constraints, references, unknowns, and acceptance evidence into input an engineering team can review.
Path B reduces basic product-development content and concentrates on rights, positioning, product facts, demonstrations, sales pages, attribution, and data iteration.
Yes. The shared challenge proves that every qualified creator understands the full commercial loop. Different weights measure the core gap each course is designed to close.
No. It is an internal JDTP collaboration status, not an academic, professional, engineering, employment, or legal certification.
Selected applicants learn through the private JDTP learner portal. Before payment, the written invitation states access, the current schedule, the review window, and any applicable refund or withdrawal rules.
No. Passing adds you to the Qualified Creator roster and makes you eligible to apply for product activities. Every product still goes through separate rights, engineering, sample, and unit-economics review.
No. Applications and training submissions do not automatically transfer intellectual property. Manufacturing, modification, display, promotion, sales, and compensation rights for a real product require separate written SKU terms.
After initial project review, you may pay a CubeTech design quote or apply for a capped recovery of design investment from future creator earnings. Product-specific terms are confirmed in writing.
Only after an eligible order has valid attribution, is delivered, clears the applicable return window, and has no open refund, dispute, or compliance hold. Rates, thresholds, timing, taxes, and payment duties are defined in the written SKU terms.
Free application
The first application does not ask for a product, CAD files, identity documents, or banking details. We use it only to recommend a learning path and decide whether to issue a paid invitation.